Xi, Biden and a $10t. cost of war over Taiwan 


War over Taiwan would have such a cost in blood and money that even those unhappiest with the status quo have reason not to risk it.

Bloomberg Economics estimates the price tag at around $10 trillion, equal to about 10% of global GDP – dwarfing the blow from the war in Ukraine, the COVID pandemic, and the Global Financial Crisis.

China’s rising economic and military heft, Taiwan’s burgeoning sense of national identity, and fractious relations between Beijing and Washington mean the conditions for a crisis are ripe. With cross-Strait relations on the ballot, Taiwan’s January 13 election is a potential flashpoint.

Few put a high probability on an imminent Chinese invasion. The People’s Liberation Army isn’t massing troops on the coast. Reports of corruption in China’s military cast doubts on President Xi Jinping’s ability to wage a successful campaign. US officials say tensions eased somewhat at the November summit between US President Joe Biden and Xi, who pledged “heart-warming” measures to woo foreign investors.

Still, the outbreak of war in Ukraine and Gaza are reminders of how long-simmering tensions can erupt into conflict. Everyone from Wall Street investors to military planners and the swathe of businesses that rely on Taiwan’s semiconductors are already moving to hedge against the risk.

National security experts in the Pentagon, think tanks in the US and Japan, and global consulting firms are gaming out scenarios from a Chinese maritime “quarantine” of Taiwan, to a seizure of Taiwan’s outlying islands, to a full-scale Chinese invasion.

Jude Blanchette, a China expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said interest in a Taiwan crisis from multinational firms he advises have “exploded” since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine. This issue is raised in 95% of conversations, he added.

Taiwanese Foreign Minister Joseph Wu attends a news conference in Taipei. (credit: REUTERS/TYRONE SIU)

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and the semiconductor shortage as the world reopened from COVID lockdowns provide a small glimpse of what’s at stake for the global economy. The impact of war in the Taiwan Strait would be far bigger.

Taiwan makes most of the world’s advanced logic semiconductors, and a lot of lagging edge chips as well. Globally, 5.6% of total value added comes from sectors using chips as direct inputs – nearly $6 trillion. Total market cap for the top 20 customers of chip giant Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. is around $7.4 trillion. The Taiwan Strait is one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes.

Modeling the cost of a crisis

Bloomberg Economics has modeled two scenarios: A Chinese invasion drawing the US into a local conflict, and a blockade cutting Taiwan off from trade with the rest of the world. A suite of models is used to estimate the impact on GDP, taking account of the blow to the semiconductor supply, disruption to shipping in the region, trade sanctions and tariffs, and the impact on financial markets.

For the main protagonists, other major economies, and the world as a whole, the biggest hit comes from the missing semiconductors. Factory lines producing laptops, tablets and smartphones – where Taiwan’s high-end chips are the irreplaceable “golden screw” – would stall. Autos and other sectors that use lower-end chips would also take a significant hit.

Barriers to trade and a significant risk-off shock in financial markets add to the costs.In the case of a war:

•Taiwan’s economy would be decimated. Based on comparable recent conflicts, Bloomberg Economics estimates a 40% blow to GDP. A population and industrial base concentrated on the coast would add to the human and economic cost.

•With relations to major trade partners turned off and no access to advanced semiconductors, China’s GDP would suffer a 16.7% blow.

•For the US, further from the center of the action but still with a lot at stake – through Apple’s reliance on the Asian electronics supply chain, for example – GDP would be down 6.7%.

•For the world as a whole, GDP would be down 10.2%, with South Korea, Japan, and other East Asian economies most impacted.

A key assumption in this scenario is that the US would succeed in enlisting allies in concerted and severe economic sanctions against China. US officials say that the Chinese reaction to then-US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Taipei in August 2022 helped convince other Group of Seven countries that the risk of conflict is real.

Beijing saw it as a shift in the status quo that made Xi appear weak, particularly after domestic commentators suggested that China would be able to stop her from landing in Taipei.

The fallout from the Pelosi visit, which saw China conduct large-scale naval drills seen as practice runs for a blockade, helped build diplomatic muscle memory for concerted reactions, the US officials said.

“China’s rhetoric and the People’s Liberation Army’s response to Pelosi’s visit triggered a wave of quiet corporate contingency and scenario planning,” said Rick Waters, managing director of the China practice at Eurasia Group and formerly the top China policy official at the State Department.

Bloomberg Economics also modeled what a yearlong blockade of Taiwan by mainland China would mean for the global economy:

•For Taiwan, a small, open economy that has thrived through trade, GDP in the first year would be down 12.2%.

•For China, the US, and the world as a whole, GDP in the first year would be down 8.9%, 3.3% and 5% respectively.

The reason for the smaller impact relative to the war scenario is that while the global economy still loses access to all of Taiwan’s chips, other shocks – including tariffs between the US and its allies and China, the disruption to Asian shipping and financial market fallout – are scaled down.

The Bloomberg Economics exercise is – as far as we are aware – unique in bringing together geopolitical and economic modeling expertise. Still, the results are significantly driven by the scenario assumptions, and the band of uncertainty is wide. A war or blockade of shorter duration, and with less significant disruptions to semiconductor supply and trade, would have a smaller impact.

A consequential election

Even if the outcome of Taiwan’s election doesn’t trigger an immediate crisis, it will define the direction of cross-Strait relations.

Lai Ching-te – currently serving as vice president in the Democratic Progressive Party administration – has been at pains to present himself as a continuity candidate, with no plans to disturb relations with Beijing.

In the past, though, he described himself as a “pragmatic worker for Taiwanese independence.” For Beijing, which views the island as part of its territory, any formal push for independence would cross a red line. At his meeting with Biden, Xi expressed deep concern about the possibility of a Lai win, according to a senior administration official.

The DPP counterpoint, which aligns with the assessment in Washington, is that Beijing’s belligerence is the problem – not Taiwan’s desire for continued autonomy.

Lai’s opponents – Hou Yu-ih of the Kuomintang and Ko Wen-je of the Taiwan People’s Party – are both promising pragmatic steps to improve relations with Taiwan’s giant neighbor, without sacrificing the island’s de facto independence.

US officials say China may be planning a multipronged reaction to the election, with military incursions, economic sanctions, and grey zone tactics like cyberattacks.

Officials in Washington and Taipei said the period from the election in January to an inauguration of a new president in May is a danger zone for Chinese actions aimed at hemming in Taiwan’s next president.

Straitened circumstances

Whoever wins will have to deal with a changed and challenging set of cross-Strait realities.

In 1979, when the US switched diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing, US GDP was ten times that of China, China’s military was in the early stages of modernization, and Taiwan was still under single-party rule.

Fast forward to today and China’s GDP has closed much of the gap with the US, its military boasts near-peer status – especially close to home – and Taiwan’s liberal democracy is a visible contrast to China’s authoritarian system.Statements by leaders in Beijing and Washington have added to the tension.

Xi has said more than once that Taiwan is not an issue that can be “passed down generation after generation.” Along with his efforts to modernize the military, those statements have spurred speculation he wants to deliver unification on his watch, with 2027 cited as a danger year by US intelligence and military officials.

At his meeting with Biden, Xi vented frustration with the view that China’s forces are aiming at readiness for an invasion by 2027, which he said was mistaken, according to a senior US official.

For his part, Biden has said the US would come to Taiwan’s aid in the event of a Chinese invasion. That bluntness eroded layers of carefully crafted ambiguity about the US position, stoking anger in China and concerns the US is emboldening pro-independence boisterousness.

Bloomberg Economics’ Taiwan stress index – based on warning words used by China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and military incursions in Taiwan’s air defense identification zone – shows an elevated temperature over the last year and a half.

Investors and businesses are already preparing for the worst. Kirk Yang, chairman of equity investment fund Kirkland Capital and an expert on Asia technology firms, said the fund’s position in Taiwan is now close to zero. Geopolitical tensions have “added incentive to scale back investments at a faster pace” he said.

He’s in good company. Legendary investor Warren Buffett sold down his stake in TSMC in the first quarter of 2023, citing geopolitical risk as the reason.

Businesses and governments are also making preparations. Greenfield investment in electronics and electrical equipment rocketed to $181 billion in 2022 from $48b. in 2020 as governments in the US, Japan, and Germany opened their wallets to diversify sources of semiconductor supply.

If there’s an upside from the Bloomberg Economics analysis, perhaps it’s this: The $10 trillion cost of a crisis would be so high for all players that the incentive to avoid it is strong.

The status quo might be no one’s ideal outcome, but for Taipei, Beijing, and Washington the alternatives are worse.

That’s a reason Taiwan’s ambiguous autonomy might remain an equilibrium outcome, even as the conditions that make it so shift.

(Bloomberg News/TNS)